Welcome to my ENG 103 Blog for LaGuardia Community College!
Wednesday, November 3, 2010
Blog # 5 - Motified Thesis and Additional Body Paragraphs.
Natalia Duarte
Eng 103
Dr. McCormick
Natalia.Duarte89@gmail.com
Research Paper Draft # 3
President Obama’s Poorly Designed Health
Care Reform.
The making of President Obama’s long campaign trail explains how
the politician who emerged in an
extraordinary election, learned the personal and political skills necessary
to make history in American Politics and worldwide. Throughout his candidacy, Obama campaigned for a better health care reform. However, after more than a
year in office, he signed the new health care bill that has sparked tension and controversy
between democrats and republicans. Despite the President’s good
intention to aid those who cannot afford to buy private health insurance or to force
employers to provide their employees health coverage even in the smallest of business
by 2014, many Americans still doubt the real benefits behind this bill. Instead of creating a whole new health system, the law tries to upgrade the current one. The gap between how much Americans spend on
health care and what they get in return
occurs because they are embedded in a confusing system that gives them low
value for their money, which makes people demand more than they need. I believe that presidentObama’s health care bill was rushed, poorly designed
and it should have been implemented in a more inclusive, publicly
funded way.
The New health Care law will cause a costly and
continuous economical downturn nationwide. Peter Grier, author of Health Care Reform Bill 101; Who Will
Pay For Reform? states,“ Change like
that doesn't come cheap. More specifically, change
like that would cost
about $940 billion
over its first 10 years,according to the
Congressional Budget Office.” The law doesn’t make
a single change to achieve its goal of insuring nearly
all Americans. Instead, it provides a loose safety net designed to attract people who do
not receive health coverage
through employment and can't afford to buy their
own, who are unemployed, and those who have been dependent on their insurance
due to pre existing conditions. After the bill is enacted in 2014, insurance
companies can no longer deny coverage for pre-existing conditions, with the
exception of immigrants who will neither benefit from this law nor Medicaid even
if they pay out of their own pockets. Moreover, everyone must purchase health
insurance or face a “$695 annual fee”. According to Arthur B. Laffer,
author of How to Fix the Health-Care
Wedge, “a one trillion
increase in federal government health subsidies will accelerate health-care inflation, lead to
continued growth in health-care expenditures, and diminish our economic growth even
further.” The bill plans to overtax small businesses, large employers and
the rich. If business owners cannot afford their employees, the health-care
recipients will lose their jobs. With the rise in unemployment, more people will have to depend
on the government (welfare) to make ends meet. Additionally, they won’t be
able to pay for either health insurance or imposed fees.
Initially, America has the world’s
most expensive health care cost. According to William E.
Lafferty, author of Healing,
Medical Care, and Health Service
Organizations, “the
United States has by far the most expensive health care
system in the world per capita (per person).” Many
indices of health care effectiveness shows that the United
States fares very poorly in comparison to other developed capitalist countries.
Almost all the other developed capitalist countries have universal health care.
All their citizens are insured and their per capita costs are much lower. Even
communist Cuba and capitalist Denmark provides free health care for all of its
citizens and both countries have a lower infant mortality rate than the U.S. Indeed, many may argue that they rather have freedom then free health care but
sometimes I wonder if I am really living in the land of the free. Canada also has a much
lower infant and overall mortality rate than the U.S. Holly Dressel, author of Has
Canada Got the Cure? states,“ Most Americans are unaware that the United
States is the only country in the world that doesn’t already have a fundamentally
public-that is, tax-supported-health care system.”
In other words, the U.S has been divided between private and public health care funding for the past 30
years or so. The difference is that Canada has asingle-payer system. The government pays
for almost all medical costs. In contrast, the United States rely on many
competitive private insurance companies (non-profit as well as for- profit) and
employment-based insurance plans, ignoring the fact that this type of funding leads
to the fall in public health. It is also
unfortunate that about half of all
reasons for bankruptcy in the United States are due to a serious health problems,
coverage denial, and costly medical bills. Unlike the current system, single payer would
let patients choose their own doctors and put an end to the bureaucratic policies
of private insurances. Health care would be both affordable and universal, and the
inequalities in health care would no longer contribute to the overall inequalities
of U.S. society. Therefore single-payer would be a big step in the right direction.
One of the biggest gaps in the new health care system occurs within employment-based insurance. The original
plan was to help families keep their health costs to an estimated 10% of
income, until Congress realized they
couldn’t afford to support everyone. Large
companies are expected to continue to offer coverage to their employees but we can’t
say the same about the smallest companies. For this matter,
Congress imposed the fine, which is completely understandable because every
employee, be the firm large or small, should be entitled to health coverage.
Since this bill was rushed and not carefully analyzed, something had to go wrong. The
penalty that companies will pay for failing to offer coverage is lower than
the actual cost of the insurance. So basically, employers have the choice to
either provide insurance or pay the fine since it’s cheaper. Nothing will count
against them as long as they’re paying the fine, the government won’t
interfere. To be continued…
The New health Care reform will cause a continuous economical downturn. According to Arthur B. Laffer, author of
How to Fix the Health-Care Wedge, “a one trillion increase in federal
government health subsidies will accelerate health-care inflation, lead to continued growth
in health-care expenditures, and diminish our economic growth even further.” The
bill’s plan is to overtax small businesses, large employers and the rich. If
business owners cannot afford their employees, the health-care recipients will lose
their jobs. With the rise in unemployment, more people will have to depend on the
government (welfare) to make ends meet. Additionally, they won’t be able to pay
for either health insurance or imposed fees. Thomas E. Getzen author of Health
Economics and Financing also states, “ An economic boom feels so good that
people may not realize that such high growth rates are abnormal, that another
recession is bound to come eventually” (314-15). To be continued…
Work Cited:
Dressel, Holly. “Has
Canada Got the Cure?” Yes Magazine 4 Aug.
2006. 30 Oct.2010<
http://www.yesmagazine.org/issues/health-care-for-all/has-canada-got-the-cure>.
Getzen, Thomas E. “Health Economics and Finance.” Ed. Wiley,
4th edition. New Jersey, 2010. 314-15.
Print.
Laffer B. Arthur. “How to Fix the Health-Care Wedge.” The Wall Street Journal
5
Aug. 2009. 19 Oct.
2010 SB1000124052970204619004574324361508092006.html>.
Lafferty E. William. The Journal of Alternative
and Complementary Medicine.
Healing, Medical Care, and Health Service
Organizations. Washington:
DOHS, 2004. PDF file.
Regnier Pat, Michelle Andrews, and
Amanda Gengler. " The Truth About Health
No comments:
Post a Comment